
Robert asks…
Cheap houses – Brightmoor, Detroit?
I fell over a real estate site which said that you could buy a house in Brightmoor, Detroit for about 100$. Can you just go up to the real estate broker, pay the 100 bugs, sign some papers, and then the house is yours, or are there other things to know?
How high is the housing-taxes in Detroit?
Is Brightmoor an extremely bad neighborhood since the housing prices are so low?
Please. Only answers that answers my questions. And no stupid answers please, “like, you are an idiot even considering buying a house there”

admin answers:
Yes, you can actually purchase for such low numbers, the city is trying very hard to clean up this area (impowerment zone). Property taxes in this area is very low, you will be able to afford your taxes every yr. Just try to pick streets that are highly occupied. I’ll also suggest you to check out the location before making any investment

Sandra asks…
How do I get good faith deposit released to seller when buyer non-responsive.?
California real estate buyers decided after all contingencies removed that they couldn’t go through with the deal a week before close. Buyer’s realtor is a relative of the buyers. She was given the cancellation of contract and the buyers are not signing.
The deposit is $1000. The seller has lost $3000 – lost deposits for moving, rent for a new place, money spent on inspections and home warranties not used. The seller wants the deposit.
Other than sending certified mail or walking the form over to the buyer’s house – is there any recourse other than suing? Is there a cheap way to sue? It’s only $1000 but it would help recover costs. Thank you.

admin answers:
Assuming California, small claims suits values can be up to $5000. Other states may be similar, but you’ll need to check. You can do it yourself in small claims court with minimal filing fees and you don’t need a lawyer. Just have all the documentation and be prepared to tell the judge exactly what you are wanting back and why you deserve it. Good luck.

Thomas asks…
anyone know any online sites that show you foreclosures bankruptcy homes and places like that for free?
i am trying to start a small real estate company on the side and was wondering if there are any sites out there that show you homes, pictures of them and stuff liek that for free. i would like the homes to be very cheap and foreclosures. any help on that would be nice, i dont mind signing up somewhere but i dont want to give financial, or personal info thanx

admin answers:
If you go to the lenders sites directly it will typically give you a link for the loans they have in foreclosure (REO)a great example is country wide – check it out.
Http://www.countrywide.com/purchase/f_reo.asp
just do the lenders sites directly and look under REO Properties

George asks…
quit claim question – From remarried father to son?
My father remarried and lives in a home with his wife and her 2 children. As his only son I am currently living with roomates. My father wants to put the house in my name; it is currently in his name only.
My fathers wife is foreign and she will be legal after my father and her meet with immigration this coming June (marking 2 years for her in this country I believe).
How can my father transfer ownership of the home to me? He wants it so that she has no claim to the home at all should something happen to him. Since she isn’t even a citizen yet, would she need to sign something? I am planning on taking out a loan to pay off my father who is giving me a cheap price on the home and moving out before June.
Any and all advice on this matter would be greatly appreciated; I know VERY little about real estate and do not want to pay for a home only to have someone take it from me. What type of deed should I get? Is a quit claim enough?

admin answers:
Holding title to real property as Community Property is a type of ownership available to married couples only. There are currently nine states which offer Community Property status. These states are: Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin. The “marital property act” defined Wisconsin as a community-property state, but individual circumstances will dictate how this act is interpreted.
The property laws in these nine states look at property purchased during a marriage as community property and both husband and wife have an equal right to possess the property during their marriage. In some states, upon the death of either spouse, the surviving spouse automatically receive half of the community property. With community property, neither spouse may sell his or her own share. To transfer the property to someone else, both husband and wife must sign the deed. When one spouse dies and leaves no will, the surviving spouse may acquire the property, but unlike joint tenancy, either spouse may will his half interest to others if he or she so chooses.
One thing I know that is applicable to Washington state (I’m a resident) is that wholey-owned property that belongs to a person remains the property of that person and does not automatically become ‘community’ property unless both spouses sign a Community Property Agreement which basically integrates all property into that ‘community’ property state.
It’s easy enough to find out with an inquiry to a real estate lawyer whether or not your father can do this. Her not being a citizen does not preclude her from legally owning real estate in this country. If he does intend to sell it to you, then for him to quit-claim deed it to you then you take a loan out on it to pay him for it would possibly appear as some type of fraud. If it is his right, and he doesn’t need any type of legal participation, permission, or release from his current wife to sell you the house, I would say take the most legal route on this that you can.
When a house is sold for less than it’s assessed value (county value for tax purposes) it puts up red flags at the county. However, since he is your blood father, I believe he there is a ‘gift’ thing he’s is allowed to do for reduction of or the gift of property of value.
Please, please keep it as legal as possible. It’s the best way to avoid future headaches for yourself and your dad.

Mary asks…
Recession 2007 ???
I have written about the great imbalances of the US economy. Yet in all of my previous articles on the subject I have been unable to pinpoint when these imbalances will result in a bust.
One can never be completely sure of the future, of course, as one does not have full information about all factors shaping future events. Thus, it is possible that this prediction will go wrong if the US experiences some future positive shock, such as for example a significant decline in oil prices. Australia seemed poised for a recession in 2005 after its housing market busted, but this was averted as the prices of Australia’s commodity exports soared because of increased demand from China.
However, barring such an unexpected positive shock, it seems increasingly clear that we will see a US recession this year. The main reason for this is that the housing bubble that fueled the recovery of the last few years has essentially burst.
While mortgage debt continues to climb, albeit at a slower rate than before, and while housing prices have flattened rather than declined so far, other housing market indicators point to a housing recession. New home sales have reached multi-year lows and the inventory of unsold homes reached multi-year highs. Meanwhile, residential investment has declined significantly from its peak in late 2005. From 6.3% of GDP in the third quarter of 2005 to 5.3% in the fourth quarter of 2006. However, that is still above the 4% average of the 1980s and 1990s, and also significantly above the 3.3–3.4% level of the recessions of 1982 and 1991.[1]
So far, the economy has seemingly handled this fairly well and experienced what one might call a “soft landing,” with growth being slow but still well above zero. Yet there are increasing signs that the worst is yet to come. Much of the housing bubble was financed by so-called subprime mortgages, mortgages to people with a low credit rating. Subprime mortgages were encouraged greatly by the government, with the Federal Reserve providing a cheap source of credit and with Bush encouraging it as part of the “ownership society” that he envisioned. But after the Fed was forced to raise interest rates again, and as the introductory teaser offers expired, the cost of borrowing for the subprime borrowers increased sharply. And as subprime lenders almost by definition have weak personal finances, many have proven unable to handle that.
And so we now see how the default rate has increased sharply. This will mean two things: first, new subprime loans will decline sharply. So far this year, subprime loans have declined 37% from last year.[2]
This will not only mean lower demand for new houses, but also increased supply as an increasing number of subprime borrowers are forced to leave their homes. This fact, as well as the fact that construction spending is still at historically high levels means that it is likely to decline a lot more. And if this causes outright decline in housing prices, it will have a very adverse effect on consumer spending. The household savings rate was -1.2% in January and February.[3] Meanwhile, despite record high asset valuation, the household debt to asset ratio reached record levels last year, as did the mortgage debt to housing value which hit a record high of 47% in the fourth quarter of 2006.[4] Looking beyond the aggregate number, you can see that 27% of all homeowners have less than 20% equity (more than 80% mortgage debt) in their homes and 16% have less than 10% equity, making them highly vulnerable to a fall in prices.[5]
All of this implies that the current spending pattern is dependent upon a continued rapid increase in asset prices, from levels which are historically already extremely high. Household real estate values, which in my first article on the subject I reported to be 184% of disposable income, up from the historic range of 135% to 150%, had in the fourth quarter of 2006 risen to 213% of disposable income. Meaning that there is certainly a high risk of falling prices — which, given the negative savings rate and the record high level of household debt, would imply that consumer spending will have to fall.
With residential investments likely to continue to fall and with consumer spending likely to be weak as well, the one thing that could save the US economy would be business investments. Business investments are still at a relatively moderate level, and in relation to corporate profits they are in fact historically low.
However, there are signs that corporate profits have peaked. The increase in profits over the latest year has been concentrated in the financial sector and in foreign subsidiaries of US firms. In contrast, profits at domestic non-financial industries (the sector that invests) have started to decline: in seasonally adjusted terms, they were 2.5% lower in the fourth quarter of 2006 than in the first quarter.[6] And with profits showing signs of declining, it is perhaps less important that they are still at high levels in absolute terms, because what matters for business leaders is not so much current profits, but expected future profits — or to be more precise, if businesses think additional investments will generate even higher profits.
And with the pessimism generated by the decline in profits and the trouble in the housing market, an increasing number of business leaders seem to think that the days of high profits will be over soon. Business investments fell during the fourth quarter of 2006, and judging by the weak data for non-defense, non-aircraft durable goods orders,[7] the outlook for 2007 is not particularly good.
But what about the Federal Reserve? The Fed has always been “the knight in shining armor” always saving the day by cutting interest rates — and they will do so again. At least, that’s what many people on Wall Street seem to think. And of course, Ben Bernanke would certainly be willing to provide “liquidity” — with or without helicopters — if he thought a recession was coming.
However, the fact that commodity prices continue to soar and the dollar is falling means that Bernanke will have limited scope to cut interest rates, particularly in the aggressive way that Greenspan did after the tech stock bubble burst. With businesses being reluctant to invest, and with subprime mortgages discredited, one has to wonder: where is Bernanke going to create the next bubble, the one that will mask the hangover from the housing bubble in the same way that the housing bubble masked the hangover from the tech stock bubble?

admin answers:
Dang man! You make some really good points. It is scary. However with oil going down the tubes, technology and the development of alternative forms of energy come to mind. Most of our problems have come from money grubbing government and businesses all making the wrong decisions for the wrong reasons. JMHO
Powered by Yahoo! Answers




